Municipalities lose first round in effort
to stop Rahway Valley line reactivation
By LIZ K
EILL

SUMMIT - On Friday afternoon, Dec. 5, Superior Court Assignment Judge Edward W. Beglin Jr. ruled in favor of the county and Morristown & Erie Railroad.

Judge Beglin said the legal filings were late, coming long after the agreement between Union County and the railway, which took place on May 9, 2002. - See Agreement

City Solicitor Barry Osmun, who will report on the results at the Tuesday, Dec. 16, council meeting, said the city will need to decide whether to appeal the court's decision to the appellate division. Another step the city intends to take is to appeal to the Surface Transportation Board, a federal agency that determines transportation issues.

"The judge dismissed all counts, except for two," Mr. Osmun said. One involved the Open Public Meetings Act, regarding whether sufficient notice had been given to municipalities concerning the county's intent. The other dealt with allegations of conflict of interest.

Mr. Osmun said the filing is supposed to be done within 45 days of the contract, which took place one and one-half years ago. There is an exception to the ruling if an obvious adverse effect in the public's interest can be shown. The judge decided, however, that the interests of five towns did not outweigh the interests of the county. The problem, he said, was that the county continued to assure municipalities, both verbally and in writing, that no agreement would be made with the rail line until the towns affected had input.

Mayor Walter Long said of the decision in favor of the county, "They can do what they want to do. The document is legal and binding." It bothered him, he said, that the county moved forward without the support of the local communities and without open meetings. "But they're elected officials and they can sign documents," he said.

Maher: `Disappointing result'

Summit Common Councilman John Maher said, "This is a disappointing result, but we had a sense that the state court might not be the place to rule on the issue." The five community effort will take the next step, he said, with the Surface Transportation Board in Washington, D.C. Attorney Scott Stone has been hired to represent the towns.

East Summit Association President Bob Sheehan, who attended the Elizabeth hearing, questioned whether the public notification was thorough. "The county can tack a notice on a bulletin board and they've met the requirement under the law," he said. "We have not given up. We want to reach out to residents and explain the implications. We're not quitting."

The court hearing in Elizabeth is just one step a coalition of five communities is taking to prevent the Morristown & Erie Railroad from re-opening freight lines through several Union County towns. Summit representatives have joined with people from Kenilworth, Roselle, Roselle Park and Springfield to halt the process of rebuilding the line. - See previous Newspaper Map

The communities have challenged the Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders regarding its contract with the rail line. M&E, meanwhile, has taken the position that state courts have no authority over railroad issues.

Despite organized and vocal objections, including the creation of a Stop the Train Coalition, railroad ties are being replaced and warning systems at crossings will be installed once approval is given by the Department of Transportation.

M&E expects the Cranford to Linden section to be completed by next year and the Cranford to Summit track by 2005. The discontinued rail line through Summit would require re-building of two overpass railroad bridges. - See Q & A about reactivation Full Story


Courtesy of Summit Herald - December 13, 2003
Hyperlinks by BPN

 

to previous page

 of page